Q&A of flaws in the handling of Stanford
student May Zhou’s death by certain police officers, which
served a big role in a series of fascism crimes, in
response to Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun’s side of their argues at [iDOTdoubtDOTit/tag/sebastian-thrun/]
(replace DOT with . to get the right address)
=====================
"Dr. Kelly Arthur of the Sonoma County
coroner's office, is reported to have reviewed it and said she stood by her
original finding that there were not any signs of trauma." --- that still
would not gurantee a suicide conclusion, would it? where/when/how did those
trauma come into being, then? Can Dr. Kelly Arthur explain? or would it be
wiser for the officer who drew conclusion of suicide to make sure
where/when/how did those trauma come into being before drawing conclusion of
suicide?
-------------------
“Except Peter Cao, who asserts that Mengyao Zhou
was murdered by or with the
help of Schmidt and Thrun, in order to intimidate him personally.” --- Schmidt
did threatened my life with the death of May Zhou for sake of Thrun during
their fight with Stanford. I said they killed May Zhou to intimidate me and to
terrorize Stanford; you omitted the serious part. My statement is far more reasonable
than police can give, don't you agree?
--------------------
"...
and an email that Zhou sent to her 16-year-old sister as “consistent with a
goodbye note.”
--- can we see such an email before we could believe it? How much good-bye is
there in it? How to explain the fact that May Zhou had transferred money to pay
off debt before her disappearance?
---------------------
“But then you can’t expect someone killing
themselves to make choices that appear rational to others. If it’s not
tasteless to speculate, perhaps she felt ashamed and wanted to hide herself.”
--- Is that the way you describe death of an
innocent girl as May Zhou is? Shame on you!
--- Would the officer in charge of May Zhou's
case agree? How to get connect with such an officer? I have serious stuff to
report