The whole point of infrastructure sharing is to enable competition and reduce duplication.
Regulations change all the time all over the world and if they are to increase consumer choice and driving innovation, then it's okay. The USA did it in 1996, the biggest "free market" . Sorry if you have sympathies for a specific operator, but he truth is the consumer wins and that's good for me.
Letting incumbents and entrants into the market share infrastructure helps them focus on their core business, i.e. offering telecoms services.
And for your allusion that Zimbabwe is a communist state, leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
Please can you expand this statement " yet now Potraz is doing the role of “economic planning” and the “allocation of resources” -PRIVATELY-OWNED RESOURCES, on behalf of the government." I don't get what
PRIVATELY-OWNED RESOURCES, you mean?
I guess it depends on how you look at it. Looking from a consumer's point of view, i love it since it means faster expansion of all networks, and that means more choice for me.